FIRST WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSIES HARM THIRD WORLD HEALTH
December 1st, 2010
BY KATHERINE DUNN
WELL-MEANING environmental health campaigners can kill innocent victims through unintended consequences of their positions. Whether it is opposing the use of malaria killing insecticide DDT or opposing the use of vaccines, such campaigns open environmentalists to criticism because they are opposing the use of proven disease control methods.
And while these movements are generally forged in rich countries with long life expectancies, their impact is often most marked in poorer developing countries.
The classic case is DDT ...
Full access to this article can be arranged with permission from the client that first ordered it. Please contact us to request access. Entries are uploaded to our archive at least one year after being published by a client – free access is restricted to International News Services journalists for background research only. The article date indicates when copy was filed to a client, not when posted to this archive. Upon client requests, International News Services will remove such articles from the archive or not upload them in the first place. They are included to demonstrate the breadth of topics undertaken by the agency and also to help promote clients’ coverage.