UK BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP VOTE ALARMS OVERSEAS TERRITORIES

BY KEITH NUTHALL and MELISSA WILLIAMS-SAMBRANO, in Port of Spain, Trinidad   A VOTE by the UK parliament to insist that Britain’s overseas territories introduce publicly available beneficial ownership registers by December 31, 2020, has sparked anger and dismay within these autonomous, mainly small island, jurisdictions.

An amendment to a UK Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill requires the British government to impose such registers on its OTs by this deadline, if the local administrations have not created their own. The UK currently has the world’s only public beneficial ownership register – but it only covers England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – see http://ownershiptransparency.com/

The chief ministers of the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Gibraltar have spoken out in anger, claiming the vote undermines long-established autonomy, and threatens their important financial sectors.

They have been embittered by the law does not cover UK crown dependencies the Isle of Man, Guernsey and Jersey (because of centuries-long conventions, UK legislation usually does not apply to these three jurisdictions, but it does to OTs).

Other territories covered by amendment to Britain’s Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill include Anguilla, the Turks & Caicos Islands, the Falkland Islands, Montserrat, and other small islands less dependent on financial services.

For the OTs with major finance sectors, BVI Premier Orlando Smith was typical in his criticism, claiming: “This is a deeply flawed policy,” harming BVI efforts to recover from last year’s devastating hurricane season. He and other OT premiers argued that not only would a public register cause investors, companies, insurers and deposit holders to quit their financial sectors for jurisdictions with tougher privacy laws, but that existing closed OT beneficial ownership registers already fighting financial crime effectively.

Bermuda’s Premier David Burt says his territory “already has some of the most responsive and comprehensive registers of beneficial ownership…those registers are updated in real time on every share transfer…”

Cayman financial services and home affairs minister Tara Rivers stressed the Caymans’ “high level of ongoing cooperation” on beneficial ownership, which enables more than 100 tax authorities globally, including HMRC, and UK crime agencies to access information “which states who owns what and how much in relation to Cayman companies”.

As for the potential impact on OT’s should the UK impose public registers, University of the West Indies (UWI) economists warned of trouble ahead. Dr Anthony Gonzales, honorary research fellow at UWI’s Trinidad branch, says: “That is the mainstay of their economies. So, if that goes you could just imagine what you’re left with. They’re heavily dependent on offshore banking, to generate government revenue and foreign exchange.” He wondered if – ultimately – the UK would go ahead with the change, because if they crashed, “these countries would have to look to Britain to fund them”.

Economist Jeremy Stephen, president of the Barbados Economics Society and lecturer at UWI’s Barbados, campus, thinks the OTs could adapt their economies to survive and comply with the new rules. This would include building on their financial expertise, he suggests, developing exports such as hedge fund services and financial technologies, to “sustain these economies”, while “practising transparency in their financial sectors”. Without this, OTs “may have to rethink if they wish to remain a territory of the UK”, because, then, a register could “shut down the economy completely”.

But would public registers be more effective than OTs’ existing beneficial ownership registers, whose information is made available to the UK and foreign governments on request rather than to the public. See http://www.bma.bm/company-matters/SitePages/Disclosure.aspx; http://www.gov.ky/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/12366470.PDF and http://www.bvi.gov.vg/media-centre/beneficial-ownership-search-platform-goes-live-june-30

Philip Anderson, director of corporate services provider Estera Services (Bermuda) Ltd, and an FCCA, says no, asking who wants to see the information and noting that to fight tax evasion or money laundering – it is governments. Tax inspectors, anti-money laundering regulators and police already have the right obtain information from OT beneficial ownership registers, he says. Also, by making registers public, there are real downsides, he suggested. The loss of privacy to wealthy investors and depositors could increase their security risks, he suggested: “There are genuine threats of kidnapping. People who have such wealth need protection.” Meanwhile, all beneficial ownership registers will need to comply with data protection laws, gaining in strength worldwide, such as the European Union’s (EU) general data protection regulation, in force from May 25 – which will protect information about EU-based depositors and investors in Bermuda, even though it and other OTs remain outside the EU. 

Another issue, stressed by a Bermuda government official, was that beneficial ownership registers do not operate in a vacuum. Jurisdictions such as Bermuda already have comprehensive anti-money laundering controls, which involve the referral of suspicious transactions to the Bermuda Financial Intelligence agency, for follow up and potential legal action

By contrast, anti-corruption group Transparency International disagrees, with Maira Martini, its knowledge coordinator, saying: “A public register is the best model.” A TI note adds: “Obstacles to accessing this information or delays in transferring it to authorities make it harder to follow the money back to its source.” TI also wats robust verification through cross-checking information provided with other government databases (such as tax agencies, passport authorities, vehicle and property registries, and electoral registries), on-site inspections, software, and other reliable information.

 

FINANCE IS BIG BUSINESS FOR UK OVERSEAS TERRITORIES

 

*Bermuda’s annual GDP from Q4 2016 to Q3 2017 was USD4.77 billion. Its positive trade balance in services was USD1.569 billion, much financial. International business, including insurance, accounts for 27.3% of GDP; financial intermediation 12.6%, for instance. Wealth is high – USD73,000-per-head of the 65,300 population. See https://www.gov.bm/sites/default/files/Quarterly-GDP-Publication-Q3-2017.pdf . The UN says Bermuda’s annual GDP per capita is USD94,399. See http://data.un.org/en/iso/bm.html

*The British Virgin Islands’ (BVI) 2017 GDP, says the UN, was USD908 million – of which 87.8% comprised services. According to consultancy Capital Economics, the BVI’s international business and finance centre generates USD330 million annually and delivers three-fifths of government revenue. The 31,000 islanders enjoy an average GDP-per-head of USD30,144. http://data.un.org/en/iso/vg.html

*The Cayman Islands government says financial and insurance services accounts for 40.5% of the territory’s USD2.96 billion GDP (in 2016). See https://www.eso.ky/app/webroot/data/files/Pie%20Chart-GDP%20Share%20by%20Industry%202016.pdf The 60,765 islanders have a USD48,314 annual GDP-per-head lifestyle.

*These incomes far exceed those of many Caribbean independent countries lacking such offshore finance expertise. The annual GDP-per-head for Dominica’s 74,000 people was USD7,051 in 2017, says the UN. In St Kitts & Nevis – it was USD15,771 (population 54,821). In Trinidad & Tobago (population 1.3 million), it was USD19,062. In Jamaica (population 2.8 million) – USD5,105.

 

ENDS